Tuesday, February 27, 2018

ART AND THE MYSTIC PERSPECTIVE

Image result for picture of starry night by van gogh



When I talk of art, I am talking about the things we humans do to express who we are and what we're about; that gives us a sense of identity. I could (and perhaps should) talk about art in terms of the arts; the art of movement, architecture, fashion,  cooking,  drama, writing, sculpture, painting, plumbing, farming, multimedia, music, woodworking, and so on.

Art is pervasive.

Art is anything and in everything we humans do that involves creativity; from the person who puts initials in the newly poured cement of a sidewalk to a grandchild who makes grandma's cake recipe for a family celebration.

One might ask what do such mundane experiences have to do with mysticism?

Mysticism involves recognizing the markers that remind us who we are, what we're connected to, and where we are on the path toward a greater realization of being, what I have referred to as Paradise Regained in past posts.  These markers are echoed in the products we humans create.

LESSONS IN LEFSE

My wife's grandmother, Grandma T. was Norwegian and made a lot of lefse around Christmas.  My wife was not a fan, but I became one.  Grandma T. came from humble Norwegian stock - farmers and homesteaders in South Dakota.  They lived simply.  Her lefse captures the essence of that simplicity.  She didn't have any fancy devices to make it, no specific lefse roller.  It was all made by hand, rolled out by hand, and baked on a cast iron griddle.  People in the area loved her lefse.  I love her lefse.  It has its own flavor and texture.   She made no secret of it and gladly taught people how to make it. 

She taught me, and that was an experience in  itself.  Everything done by touch, taste, sight and smell.  "You boil your potatoes and wait until they're this temperature,"  thrusting my hand in to a pot of drained boiled potatoes, "and then you add about this much lard and mash it all together.  Then you add about this much flour, and knead it until it feels like this. Then you roll out like so and put it on the griddle and wait till it starts to bubble and brown a little and smell like this." 

Touch, sight, smell, and eventually taste.

People on my wife's side of the family and in the area Grandma T.  lived use her simple recipe to this day.  I've had other types of lefse and none of them come close to what Grandma T. made.  If I want it, I have to make it.  I have her cast iron griddle and pans - prized possessions.  You can't taste lefse made from her recipe without calling her and her life stories to mind.

Her lefse is not about perfection, it's about experience.  There is no consistent outcome in making Grandma T.'s lefse.  Each piece is an individual creation in itself; each piece a playful experience awaiting one's creative way of enjoying it.   Each piece a work of art.

Mysticism is experiencing a greater sense of  what I call Self.  I'm not a blood relative of Grandma T.. Apart from the relationship I share with her as my wife's grandmother, we are part of the same Self that all humans, all created things, are. All of us are discrete aspects of that same Self, that myriad of individual creations expressing a universal Being, the Self we emerged from and are merging with.  We are works of art for the moment at least, just like Grandma T.'s lefse.  As individual aspects of the Self we emerged from, we interact with other aspects such as my interactions with Grandma T..  This broad interactive and mystic perspective of life is embedded in all forms of human art.

CREATED THINGS

It is unfortunate that the term creation has been hijacked in the mindless debate over evolution by "creationists" who insist on their literal understanding of how everything came into being.  I'm not going to spend time on that debate but rather attempt to reclaim the concept of creation as it applies to art.

Essentially art is using a material or the function of material things in way to create something "more" than the mere sum of its individual parts and their functions.  Creativity begins in the imagination, the sense of things before being realized.  More often than not, the sense of things evolve as they take shape. The imagination is never far from the completed work. One could say that imagination is embedded in each work of art and is what connects the work of art to the person experiencing it.

The mystic perspective is connected to this imaginative property experienced in art.  There is always a  part of the creator residing in the creation, and that is not all.  Works of art take on a life of their own;  inspiring interpretation and other creations.  Once a painting is framed, a sculpture put on a pedestal, a musical score completed, a playwright's  script published, a piece of lefse put on a plate, it is freed to be interpreted, free to inspire the creative imagination of others.

Once you experience a Rembrandt, a Rothko,  a Van Gogh, a Vermeer; once you experience a Michelangelo, a Rodin, or a Calder; once you experience Bach, Duke Ellington, Nat King Cole, The Beatles, or Eminem; once you experience a play by Aristophanes, Shakespeare, Arthur Miller; once you experience Grandma T.'s lefse, you know something of the artist and are open to inspiration.

Paradoxically, the individualism expressed in art has a unifying effect on those experiencing it. 

Art congregates. 

Museums, concert halls, restaurants, or a family dinning table ; anyplace that uses art in any form to draw people attests to art's congregating properties.

PAUSE

Art replicates the human experience.  Go to any museum, whether it be a fine art, a historical, or  scientific museum and what they all have common is a series of still lifes that portray the human journey.  Go to any theater, concert hall; any venue where art is being performed and one can be drawn into a unitive (shared) experience of the human journey. What all of these places have in common is that the experience of them is more than the art or more than the performance, it is also about the experience the audience, the spectators standing or sitting in silence have in a shared, unitive moment of mutual observation on what it is to be human.

A Starry Night

When we are visiting our youngest daughter in New York City, I like visiting one of their many museums. My favorite is the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA).  There is one painting in MoMA that consistently has a small crowd gathered around it, Van Gogh's Starry Night.  I love that painting as do millions, and it is always a thrill to stand in front of it to see it "live." 

I am always impressed by the small crowd, pressed together, trying to share the same view.  There is a sense of hushed reverence.  Spectators become silent in its presence.  In essence, it is a religious experience.  The only thing that seems to missing is candles and incense to underscore it.  The painting is the draw, and it speaks to us of the wonder of the universe in which we live.  The experience is in standing with people from around the world in a shared, unitive moment of deep respect for a human creation and the human who created it. Van Gogh remains present in the painting's colors and swirls of the sculpted oil he created.

One thing that can be missed on a first visit is the fact that Van Gogh didn't fully cover the canvas with the painting.  There is a space on the left and right side of the canvas that is untouched by paint.  One might be tempted to say he didn't finish the painting but he did, and the thin uneven patches of raw canvas peeking out at the painting's edge sends its own message (at least to me), "There is more." 

The blank patches give the painting a sense a linearity (probably unintended); that the scene Van Gogh painted is a moment squeezed between a before moment and an after moment; that we are transfixed by the moment he portrays and what a moment it is.  What Van Gogh captures is the essence of Pause as I have been using it in these posts on mysticism; those moments between moments that lead to transfiguration.

Pause is not only expressed in the visual arts, but all of the arts.  The noted rest in music, the prolonged pose in dance, the dramatic or comedic pause by an actor in the performance of her line are done to bring the audience to a transfiguring moment  frequently defined as resolution.

TRANSFIGURATION

One of the best artistic examples I can personally think of that demonstrates an artistic resolution of pause into transfiguration is a performance by Simon Johnson on the grand organ at  St.Paul's Cathedral in London, England.  I consider the cathedral Christopher Wren built and the pipe organ that has been installed  and added on to over the centuries to be one instrument. The resonance of the domed cathedral is unique in its ability to capture and hold onto sound whether vocal or instrumental.

While visiting the Cathedral with my family in 2011, I purchased a recording of Simon Johnson playing the organ which included William Strickland's  arrangement of Samuel Barber's Adagio for Strings.  Barber's Adagio  has been adapted from its original string composition to arrangements for voice, organ, and piano.  The Adagio exemplifies the transition from Pause to Transfiguration.  It lyrically builds upon a slow, soft, melodic theme framed by various notational contexts (variations) that from a mystic perspective express the unitive force finding expression in individual moments, the variations of a common theme played out in various contexts of life.

My favorite way of listening to Simon Johnson's performance of  Barber's piece at St. Paul's is to sit in candle light or dim lighting with my headphones on to keep away any distractions.  In fact, I prefer to listen to all musical performances from a recording rather than live performances for the same reason.  I find audiences distracting during musical performances.  It's not the audience.  It's a me-thing.  I'm easily distracted by people. Church services being an exception; in part, because my focus is on other things. 

Mr. Johnson brilliantly plays the cathedral as much as he plays the organ.  He utilizes its unique reverberation and the organ's tonality to maximize the impact of Barber's Adagio on the listener.  As the piece reaches its pinnacle point of the prolonged crescendo, I visualize the dome of the cathedral as an inverted cup filling up with sound - sound that overflows the rim of the dome and pours out into the transepts and into the nave until he stops feeding it.  When his hands and feet leave the keyboard and pedalboard, the sound lingers for few seconds as it naturally decays and decrescedos into the silence of the cathedral which he allows to settle in (pause) to give the piece the dramatic effect it deserves, and then the theme quietly begins as it started and continues to an elongated, hushed ending that hints at its continuation in another realm.

Transfiguration is about merger; the end point we are all headed for, the singularity from which it all began, from which we and everything before and after emerges. This transfigurative property is found in artistic expressions.  Transfiguration results in seeing things differently, hearing things differently, and feeling things differently.  Transfiguration is seeing the bigger picture of our unitive existence through a perspective that can be experienced and expressed only through a work of creativity.

The Transfiguration Story Revisited

To illustrate what I've just said and to connect the dots to what I've written in my posts on the mystic journey, allow me to revisit the work of art that started me on this venture into mysticism, the story of Jesus's Transfiguration.


When Jesus was on the mountain top with his disciples Peter, James and John, Jesus began to glow and there appeared in that glow along with him, Moses and Elijah.   Then a cloud covers all six of them and the voice of God says, "This is my beloved Son, listen to him."  


At that very isolated moment, which beloved son was God referring to?  Moses, Elijah, or Jesus?  Each, in their own linear moment, could have been referred to as such.  Each in their own time demanded attention.  

Theologically speaking, there are answers to why God meant Jesus, but at the moment I'm not going to consider them because there appears to be mystical perspective offered in the story that transcends mere theological speculation; a perspective hinted in the  artistry of the story's presentation.  This story is all about sight, sound, and feeling, the tools of art used to bring one to a greater sense of being.  It is about being transfixed by and in a momentary experience shared by others.

What the story utilizes is something that Christians largely treat with suspicion, numerology as symbolism.  Numbers have been given meanings through the ages beyond their mere arithmetic functions. The New Testament uses numbers in a symbolic fashion. 

Three disciples and three personages of the term "Son;" three observers and three conversers.  Six in all; the number representing  making of man by God in God's image.  The number six is also used to represents chaos or confusion as reflected in Peter's response. 

Then there is the cloud - bright in one version, hinted at being dark in others - a dramatic  (one could say abstract) pause between one moment and another - a moment of wilderness before transfiguration brings us back to a new perspective of the person left standing on the mountain, Jesus.

 Jesus in this story is portrayed as the unitive Son of God - the Son or Child of God in whom all God's Children are present.  That's the art of this story (and the art of theology at its finest).

The mystic perspective always brings us back to the present in a new transfigured light after shedding light on the moment captured by an artist. It is the new light of transfiguration that moves one forward on the mystic journey we are all on. 

Art makes us pause.  Art transfigurates. 

Art expresses the unitive force that is keeping the universe together; the force that is heard in Barber's Adagio, the force that is seen in Van Gogh's Starry Night, and the force that is tasted in Grandma T.'s lefse.

Until next time, stay faithful.


Thursday, February 15, 2018

REND YOUR HEARTS - A Homily


Yet even now, says the LORD, return to me with all your heart, with fasting, with weeping, and with mourning; rend your hearts and not your clothing.  Joel 2:12
What a dramatic rollercoaster ride the Church Year can provide! 

Three days ago we were having a mountaintop experience with Peter, James and John as Jesus was transfigured, and today we find ourselves torn between a feast, St. Valentine’s Day, and the beginning of a fast, Ash Wednesday. Do we feast today or do we begin a fast today?  Do we feel torn?  It’s all very dramatic.   How can it not be? The drama of romance and “weeping with mourning” are matters of the heart.
Yet, if one thinks about it, there is sense of serendipity about these two seemingly opposite holy days falling on the same day.  The highly commercialized Feast of St. Valentine has become a very human affair embraced by the religious and non-religious alike.  Whether one identifies as religious or not, we’re all on the same page when it comes to human romance, the attraction of love, symbolized by hearts and expressions of appreciation for being who one is.

That is not bad and not something we should piously reject.  Commercialized or not, St. Valentine’s Day has value – a brief moment that encourages everyone to  send their love to others – a reminder to us who follow Jesus, that true love, the essence of God is all around.
Then there’s Ash Wednesday – not everyone’s cup of tea, traditionally speaking.  Some Christians honor it, others ignore it.

When I was younger, and a Lutheran, I use to find Lent annoying because it seemed depressing to me, all this talk about sin and repentance, weeping, mourning, suffering and dying. As far as that all went, I thought we Lutherans had Lent down really well.  We Lutherans weren’t really into fasting, but we weren’t into feeling good about much of anything during Lent.
When I attended a Lutheran pre-seminary in pursuit of becoming a Lutheran pastor there was a hymn we sang during Lent called “Stricken, smitten, and afflicted” [1]a real downer as hymns go. While the hymn talked about the suffering of Jesus, I remember one of my classmates joke that stricken, smitten, and afflicted was exactly how he felt after going through forty days of Lent as a Lutheran.

I agreed, but looking back, I have to ask myself, “But wasn’t that the point?” Isn’t the point of Lent about having an experience that results in transfiguring who we are?
There is a phrase that seems to have fallen from common use, “Learning by heart.”  It seems to me, that learning things by heart is mostly applied to what children do or did.  At least it was a phrase used when I had to memorize something for a Christmas pageant or for confirmation.  I had to learn it by heart, by saying it over and over until I could say it verbatim as if it was a part of me; something I came up with.

Most of childhood learning is, experiential, is a matter of taking things to heart.  The things we remember most; that stick with us, that taught us something on a deeper, feeling level come from the things we experienced. Memories of the mind can fade.  Mine do occasionally, but the memory of the heart does not. Things, “learned by heart,” can be recited decades later by someone who no longer remembers the name of a spouse or a loved child.
Lent is the most dramatic season of the Church Year for a reason and by drama I mean the art of drama, creating and enacting experiences through ritual that touch the heart and help us understand that we are, all of us, creations of Love. The earliest form of drama was ritual. Ritual remains important because it is experiential; involving ours senses and our emotions.

Ritual remains one of the oldest learning devices we humans continue to utilize.  Before our ancient ancestors could write down their experiences, it was the experience of ritual that taught their hearts lessons that would not fade; lessons that could be passed from one generation to the next. Rituals became systemized into traditions; the recognizable seasons of shared experiences through the ages.
Our traditions, our rituals are not intended to save us.  They’re intended to teach us lessons of the heart.

Whether we are fasting or feasting will not affect God’s love for us, as we heard Paul tell the Corinthians three Sundays ago when asked about eating meat offered to idols. God is constant in love, but we are less so. We need constant reminders of God’s love and who we are so that we become a reflection of that love.  We need experiences that reach the core of our being in order to do so.
So the prophet Joel dramatically depicts God telling us, “Return to me with all your heart.”  God says do it through fasting, with weeping, and with mourning.  In other words, make a dramatic turn around, an experiential one; one that involves action and emotion; one that brings us back to who we truly are, children of God.

Fasting with weeping and mourning becomes our response to the experience of acting in ways that have lessened who we are. Sincere fasting is a natural response to a feeling that removes one’s desire for the things of this world; as in the “I’m just not hungry “response we hear from someone experiencing a sense of deep personal loss.
That’s where God is going with this:    God wants us to lose our appetite for what isn’t real. God want us to lose our appetite for what lessens who we truly are.

If I were to reduce the experience of sin to one word, that one word would be selfish. Any term that can be suffixed with “ish” is an indication that it’s not the real thing, but rather an approximation that is less than real or presented as being more than what it really is.
Sin is anything that approximates who we truly are. To be selfish means to present an ambiguous portrayal of one’s true self; to act in a way that misses the point of our existence which is to be a reflection of God’s glory.

The Apostle Paul wrote in his Letter to the Romans, “All have sinned and fallen short of the Glory of God.” [2] We are all selfish in that respect because whatever occludes the reflection of God’s creative glory in our lives is the essence of sin whether it is the selfish things we do or the selfish things we fail to do.
Selfishness is a problem as old as Adam and Eve. It has affected our relationships with one another and with God ever since they bit into the idea that they could something they weren’t.

We’ve been running away from who we are, hiding behind facades to be something other than what  we are ever since, and ever since, we have been chased, called back, wiped cleaned and made whole by a Love that will not let us go.  This Godly pursuit to bring us back to who we are is at the heart of Jesus’ teaching to love our neighbors as ourselves and to love our enemies, for if we cannot love that which God loves, we cannot love God.
Both selfishness and love are contagions affecting the heart; one a disease, the other its cure.

In our reading from the Gospel of Mark, Jesus approaches this spiritual disease from another perspective by addressing it with the religious of his day and to anyone who sits in a pew today. Jesus uses the word hypocrite three times to condemn the selfish practices of the religious who put on a display of piety to make themselves appear better, more holy than they are. Jesus is telling us that true piety is not meant to be a spectacle, but a secretive affair of the heart between the Creator and the created.

“Rend your hearts and not your garments.”
So on this day, February 14th 2018, a day in which there is confluence of two holy days focused on the heart, we are reminded that true love can only proceed from a true heart, a broke open and sincere heart; one that is true to self and true to God, one that has lost its appetite for all things selfish.  On this day, we take to heart the traditional ritual of penance; of being marked by the carbon of our origin in a shape of Christ’s redeeming cross and hearing the words God said to Adam after Adam’s participation in humankind’s first selfish moment, “Remember that you are dust, and to dust you shall return” – God’s poignant yet loving reminder of what we are and whose we are.

In this moment of ritual and tradition, we begin the journey into this turn-around season of Lent toward the reset point of new life in the risen Christ, by reciting the words of a psalmist whose contrite heart spoke millennial ago for the hearts of every contrite penitent and by confessing our selfish ways in order to push away from them to let the glory of God shine in and through our true selves.
May this turn-around season of Lent be for us a journey into that Love which will not us go.

Amen.   
* * * * * * * * * *
Until next time, stay faithful.




[1] Thomas Kelly 1769-1855 set to the tune “O Mein Jesu, Ich Muss Sterben,” Geistliche Volkslieder 1850
[2] Romans 3:23