Sunday, September 29, 2019

JEREMIAH - A Homily


This homily was delivered by this blogger on Sunday, September 29, 2019 at Christ Episcopal Church in Yankton, South Dakota.


If they do not hear Moses and the prophets, neither will they be convinced is some one should rise from the dead.”  Luke 16: 31



+In the Name of our loving God+



For the past several Sundays we have been reading selections from the Book of Jeremiah.  It would do us well to spend a little time getting to know him better because his prophecies are relevant in every age and seem particularly relevant in our own.



To understand the Book of Jeremiah, one has to understand what led God to call him to be a prophet.  In particular, it is important to understand the time of King Manasseh[1] who, by worldly standards, might be considered the most successful king of Judah, reigning some fifty-five years in what would be considered a relatively peaceful and prosperous time in Judah’s history. 



In the Hebrew Scripture, however, Manasseh is vilified as being the most corrupt king of Judah , who promoted the worship of the Canaanite Baals, the goddess Asherah, and the god Molech; a god who required human sacrifice in the form of throwing living children into the fiery belly of Molech’s idol. 



The Kingdom of Judah stood at the crossroad of powerful empires; Egypt to the south and Assyria and Babylonia to the north.  Keeping the Kingdom of Judah intact required forming alliances with other kingdoms in the area which led kings, like Manasseh to adopt or permit the religious practices of these Canaanite kingdoms that became popular with the inhabitants of Judah, forsaking the God of Abraham who their ancestors were in a covenantal relationship with.[2]



As a result, Jeremiah was compelled by God to deliver a very troubling message to the kings of Judah and the people of Jerusalem about the imminent destruction of Jerusalem by the Babylonians who would take a large portion of its inhabitants back to Babylonia; a captivity which would last for seventy years.



I think of Jeremiah as “the reluctant prophet” – a person burdened with a message he did not want to deliver but had no choice but to deliver it.



If you want to know what it feels like to be a prophet, study Jeremiah.  For example, in Jeremiah 4, he says, ‘My anguish, my anguish!  I writhe in pain! Oh, the walls of my heart! My heart is beating wildly, I cannot keep silent, for I hear the sound of the trumpet, the alarm of war!”[3]  In Jeremiah 20 he says, “For the word of the Lord has become for me a reproach and derision all day long.  If I say, ‘I will not mention him (the Lord), or speak any more in his name,” there is in my heart as it were a burning fire shut up in my bones, and I am weary with holding it in, and I cannot.”[4]



The Book of Jeremiah is also a study in the proclivity of us humans to hold on to our concretized, ideological beliefs no matter what reality is starring us in the face.  Studying Jeremiah taught me that prophesy basically boils down to seeing thing for what they are and stating the ignored obvious; especially, to those who are in positions of authority and power. 



To add to Jeremiahs’ troubles is the fact there were other prophet living in Jerusalem at the time who told its kings and those in authority what they wanted to hear.  While Jeremiah was saying, “The city will be laid to waste, your people killed; your inhabitants and the king taken captive by the Babylonians,” they were saying, “Jeremiah is a liar.  Peace will reign.”  Which is easier to believe, a group of people who tell you peace is around the corner or a person who says you’re going to war and will lose that war and will be taken captive?



There is good news in Jeremiah, but it is not the type of good news the people at the time wanted or were willing to hear.  Jeremiah said that their captivity would come to an end; that they would return home as renewed people of God.  In fact, the religion we know as Judaism today was created during the Babylonian Captivity; that much of the Hebrew Scripture, what we call the Old Testament, was written during that time and in the years following their captivity.



It is hard to listen to those voices who deliver uncomfortable messages about our behavior and the effect it is having on our world, our nation, and ourselves even as we are experiencing the truth of those messages.  It is hard for any of us to override, in our minds, what we want to believe as truth, even when faced with undeniable facts that challenge its veracity. It is so much easier to listen to those who tell us what we want to hear; especially, if their message is, “There’s nothing wrong.  Everything is fine. No need to worry.” 



We attempt to mitigate our anxieties over what is happening today by referencing the past, saying “Things like this has happened before.  We’ll get through it.  You think this is bad?  You should have lived at such and such time.”  There is truth and fact in making such statement, but there is little comfort in them and no incentive to address current difficulties; to turn things around and cause us to repent of our contributions to what is wrong with the world we live in.



This is even more pressing in a democracy; in a democratic nation like ours where there is no king to blame, where what is done by its elected leaders is a reflection of and on its electorate.  This is the reason why some Episcopal churches, during the confession of Sins, confess the sins of our nation; the sins committed on our behalf through the actions or the inactions by the leaders we elected.  



Jeremiah was never killed as other prophets were, but he was publicly humiliated and beat up, placed in stocks by the chief priest of the Temple; threatened with death by those in high places and, at one point, lowered into a cistern becoming stuck in the deep, thick mud at its base; rendering him motionless and left to die only to be saved by an Ethiopian eunuch at the king’s request.

As in the days of Jeremiah; as in every age, there are prophets telling us differing things, and the question becomes, “Who should we pay attention to?



If the story of Jeremiah offers any indication who to listen to, it is those who have no power of their own, who are compelled to tell us things they don’t want to say and we don’t want to hear, warning us that our actions or lack of action is resulting in harm done to ourselves and others.  More to the point listen to the voices of the persecuted, the vulnerable, the ridiculed, the intimidated, the scorned, and the threatened; especially, when such things are done by those who have authority and weal political power.  For in the consistency of their messages, we can discern the voice of God speaking things we need to listen to over the voices of those who would have us turn a deaf ear to such messages and a blind eye to what they are exposing.



It is hard for some in this world to hear such messages because they imply a need for dependence on a power that is not divided, that cannot be manipulated, which favors no one in particular, but rather loves all.  How hard the world must seem for those who see no need for a God who watches over the sparrow, the lilies of the field, the alien immigrant, the poor, and the homeless in our midst; who see themselves reliant solely on their own power, who have no time to listen to the prophetic voices of the day, who turn a blind eye to what the risen Christ can bring to their lives and the lives of all living beings.



Why we read and listen to the voices of the Old Testament, the Hebrew Scriptures, is because they are relevant.  They wake us up by their accusations to who we are and whose we are.  They awaken us to the only hope there is found in a loving God.  They expose us to the closeness of God, who works with what we present; who lets us be who we are and loves us no matter what we do or don’t do, who remains faithful in spite of our lack of faith, who has promised to redeem, restore, and renew all creation.



They tell us that we are in a sympathetic and synchronized relationship with a God[5] who is always near, always ready to forgive, always ready to treat with compassion; attributes that are readily transmitted throughout the world when we are forgiving, when we are compassionate, and when we engage in doing the redemptive and restorative work of the resurrected Christ.



God has no desire to keep us captive by our sinful inclinations.  As he said to Jeremiah, “I will put my law within them, and I will write it upon their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.  And no longer shall each man teach his neighbor and each man his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord’ for they shall know me, from the least of them to the greatest, say the Lord; for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sins no more.”[6]

* * * * * * * * * *
Until next time, stay faithful.



[1] Manasseh reigned for 55 years and died approximately ten years before Jeremiah was born in the 7th century BCE.
[2] See Joshua 24:16-24.
[3] Jeremiah 4:20

[4] Jeremiah 20:8b-9.
[5] See Jeremiah 17:10
[6] Jeremiah 31:34

FAMILIA SANCTI - A Homily

This homily was delivered by this blogger on September 22, 2019 at Christ Episcopal Church in Yankton, South Dakota.

+ In the Name of our loving God+



One of the shortest homilies I ever heard was one given in our neighboring church, to the east of us, at Sacred Heart, some 40 years ago by the priest who, after the Gospel reading, presented his homily saying something on the order of, “Some of the Gospel readings and the things Jesus says are not always easy to understand today and we may find them confusing.  This is one of them,” and then he sat down, ending his homily.  I can understand his thinking after today’s Gospel lesson. 



The Episcopal priest and theologian, Robert Capon wrote a series of books on the Parables of Jesus in which he called this parable, about the dishonest manager, “The Hardest Parable.[1]

Capon wrote that because of the difficulty in understanding its meaning and purpose, some priests, pastors, ministers, and theologians question its authenticity; as in, questioning whether it was something Jesus actually said. 



Others simply cherry pick their way around the parable and go to Jesus’ interpretive explanation of it; sticking with topics like “those who are faithful in a little are likely to be faithful in much” or “those who are dishonest in little will be dishonest in much.”  Another popular topic is about serving two masters; that you will either love the one or hate the other, that you cannot love worldly wealth and God.[2] All are all good topics to preach on and are also very effective ways to avoid talking about this parable.



What makes this parable difficult to understand is what Jesus says at the end of his telling it:



“And (the household manger’s) master commended the dishonest manager because he had acted shrewdly; for the children of this age are more shrewd in dealing with their own generation than are the children of light. And I tell you, make friends for yourselves by means of dishonest wealth so that when it is gone, they may welcome you into the eternal homes.”[3]



“Make friends by means of dishonest wealth so that when it is gone, they may welcome you into the eternal homes?”  What does Jesus mean by that statement?



To answer that question, we need to back up and put this parable in context both with regard to the time in which Jesus is telling it and with regard to its placement within the Gospel of Luke. 



It’s placement within Luke is significant.  This parable immediately follows the Jesus’ parable of the Prodigal Son, a parable Jesus addresses to a crowd of scribes, Pharisees, and those who Luke identifies as sinners. In today’s Gospel lesson, Jesus is telling this parable to his disciples – his inner circle of friends – his adopted family. 



Both parables share a common theme; squandering wealth, wasting it foolishly, expending it selfishly until they find themselves entrapped by their behavior and awakened to the fact that the only thing they have left to spend is themselves.  What might be lost on us is the terminology of a household manager or a steward.  We might think of such individuals in terms of modern day employees, but in Jesus’s day a household manager or steward was considered part of the household – part of the family.  They lived in the same house as their master, and they were trusted; treated as extended family like the ancient Roman concept of pater familia, which gave the head of household, the eldest male member of a family, complete authority over every member of the household as he saw fit; including immediate family members, family clients, freedmen, and slaves. 



Then there is the topic of wealth or money; something that Jesus, at times, addresses directly as there being a right or wrong way of using it and sometimes, metaphorically, as an example of the unearned grace of God given to all.  In this parable, Jesus addresses wealth directly; identifying it as dishonest wealth or as unrighteous mammon in other translations; which is to say that worldly wealth has no intrinsic spiritual value.



Whether worldly wealth is considered a bane or blessing is solely dependent on how it is used; that loving or being obsessed with money, for instance, ultimately leads to unrighteous behavior and immoral conduct.  According to Jesus’ parables, wealth (whatever form it takes) is best expended in order to expand the Kingdom of God. 



In this parable, Jesus draws a fine line between selfish interest (an unrighteousness sense of self-absorption) and true self-interest (a righteous sense of knowing who we are and whose we are). 

At first sight, there doesn’t appear to be much difference between the manager squandering his master’s wealth and reducing the debts owed his master by others.



What defines this parable as a parable of grace is that the squandering manager is considered shrewd (demonstrates good judgement) by the Lord of the household because when awakened to the fact that his personal wellbeing is directly linked to how well he is perceived and received by others, he was able to turn things around in his favor. Specifically, the awakened manager turns his habit of squandering his master’s wealth into a practice of reducing the debt owed by others to his master in the hope of their seeing him in a favorable light. 



Implicit in the master’s praise of awakened manager is the master’s realization that by reducing the debt of others, perhaps what they rightfully owe, the manager’s doing so ultimately reflects the generosity of his master, who will be looked upon with favor by those indebted to him.  His actions demonstrated true self interest by awakening to who he truly was; a member of his master’s household, dependent on the favor of his master, that he understood his actions reflected the actions of his master.



Jesus also observed that “The children of this age are more shrewd in dealing with their own generation than are the children of light.”  In other words, those outside the religious circles frequently demonstrate astuteness in their dealings with others; that they are not afraid of taking calculated risks in fostering lasting friendships unlike those in religious circles, who frequently become complacent and lack the ability to think outside the box they find themselves in.



That Jesus is addressing his disciple with this parable should give us pause to review how we, as a congregation, as disciples of Jesus, should use the unrighteous mammon, the money that has been entrusted to us. 



Are we spending it appropriately?  



Are we expending it in order to expand the Kingdom of God?



Are we awake to who we truly are; the familia Christi, the family of Christ; the very Body of Christ in the world.



Are we awakened to the reality that what we do as a congregation reflects on how others outside these walls perceive God, whether God is generous, whether God is forgiving, and whether God values them for who they are because we value them for who they are?



What is in our best self-interest as a congregation moving forward?  



Is it to preserve the things that will ultimately fade away, or is it as members of the familia Christi to be stewards of God’s grace; carrying out the redemptive work of Christ by using the unrighteous mammon we are entrusted with to make friends for ourselves in Christ so that when it fades away we will be welcomed by them into the eternal dwellings?


* * * * * * * * * *
Until next time, stay faithful.


[1] “The Parables of Grace,” Robert Farrar Capon; William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, Grand Rapids, Michigan ©1988, Chapter Fourteen, pg. 145
[2] Luke 16: 10 & 13
[3] Luke 16: 8-9